Home Search Calendar Help Login Register
Did you miss your activation email?
MurraysWorld Discussions  >  Murray Community  >  Andy Talk  >  Andy Murray becomes engaged to Kim Sears (Engagedray) 0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] Go Down Reply
Author

Andy Murray becomes engaged to Kim Sears (Engagedray)

 (Read 1640 times)
OldScotSupport
ATP Level
***
Posts: 1,807

Gender: Male
Location: North-west London

Re: Andy Murray becomes engaged to Kim Sears (Engagedray) « Reply #75 on: Yesterday at 05:15 PM »
Reply

I mis-read the title as enraged gay at first.

You always do everything round the wrong way?
IP Logged
deb
Seed
****
Posts: 4,103

Gender: Female
Location: Sussex


I'd like to be impartial, but I can't!

Re: Andy Murray becomes engaged to Kim Sears (Engagedray) « Reply #76 on: Yesterday at 08:20 PM »
Reply

Awwww bless him , what a romantic  Heart Kim is going to be a beautiful bride . Angie perhaps you could be bridesmaid  Whistle
IP Logged
angiebabez
Veteran
******
Posts: 8,103

Location: glasgow


Andy Murray Wimbledon Champion 2013

Re: Andy Murray becomes engaged to Kim Sears (Engagedray) « Reply #77 on: Yesterday at 09:56 PM »
Reply

Awwww bless him , what a romantic  Heart Kim is going to be a beautiful bride . Angie perhaps you could be bridesmaid  Whistle

 Very Sad      slap
IP Logged
deb
Seed
****
Posts: 4,103

Gender: Female
Location: Sussex


I'd like to be impartial, but I can't!

Re: Andy Murray becomes engaged to Kim Sears (Engagedray) « Reply #78 on: Yesterday at 10:14 PM »
Reply

Very Sad      slap
   roflmao roflmao upfunny
IP Logged
Milly87
Futures Level
**
Posts: 673


Re: Andy Murray becomes engaged to Kim Sears (Engagedray) « Reply #79 on: Today at 01:35 AM »
Reply

Apparantly this is Kims ring

This image has been removed from the jewllery designers website and Instagram. I'm thinking in their excitement their posted without permission and received a prompt call to remove said image. Whoops!!
IP Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 [6] Go Up Reply 
« previous next »