Register for Free
|
Forgotten your password?
Did you miss your
activation email?
MurraysWorld Discussions
>
Murray Community
>
Andy Talk
>
Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
5
Author
Topic: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals (Read 2269 times)
dave_ladder
Newbie
Posts: 59
Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« on: January 24, 2012, 02:01 AM »
Obviously I'm not taking anything for granted here with the match tomorrow, but the thought occurred to me to look up what the records are for consecutive slam semi-finals. Murray is currently on four, of course, but the all-time list is:
Roger Federer - 23
Ivan Lendl - 10
Novak Djokovic - 6*
Rafael Nadal - 5
Boris Becker - 5
Rod Laver - 4
Andre Agassi - 4
Jim Courier - 4
John McEnroe - 4
Tony Rocher - 4
Andy Murray - 4*
*Active Streak
It just goes to show you how consistent Murray has actually been over the past year or so. If (god forbid) he lost tomorrow the press would probably treat it as a massive failure, but when you look at stuff like the list above it shows you just how difficult what he's trying to do actually is. Greats like Agassi, McEnroe, etc. never made 5 semi-finals in a row.
It also has to be said that, much as I'm not a fan, Federer's consistency is completely ridiculous when you look at it. There was a stretch where he actually made 10 finals in a row (far less semi-finals) and 18 out of 19 finals overall.
IP Logged
Lurking
ATP Level
Posts: 1,645
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2012, 04:26 AM »
Borg/Mcenroe/Connors/Agassi missed Slams by choice, so there streaks aren't as long as they could/should/would be in this era.
IP Logged
killieboyd
Junior
Posts: 174
Gender:
Location: Stokesley, North Yorkshire or Hamburg
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2012, 12:38 PM »
Something noticable about that list, they all have won grand slams!
IP Logged
scotsgeek28
Futures Level
Posts: 774
Gender:
Location: St. Andrews, Scotland
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2012, 12:49 PM »
So Murray will be joint fourth in the all-time consecutive slam semi-finals list come tomorrow! Shows how far he has come.
No more losses like Verdasco, Wawrinka, Cilic and so on in slams he should have done better in. Of last he has only been beaten by the best, and it will be the same this year.
IP Logged
bhill_mfc
Satellite Level
Posts: 262
Gender:
Location: North Lanarkshire, Scotland
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2012, 01:13 PM »
Interesting stat, there are increasing amounts of stats showing Andy's place in the upper echelons of the game. He is making history without being noticed, and a lot of people do not realise what a great player he is. Here's hoping people will start taking notice as of Sunday.
IP Logged
theycanbillme
ATP Level
Posts: 2,001
Gender:
Location: London
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2012, 01:50 PM »
The signs are there that he is a great player in the waiting, the stats support it. I would even say its inevitable that he will be a multiple slam winner. But nothing's really for certain in life. Still it would be strange if he did not become one.
IP Logged
Katie
ATP Level
Posts: 1,802
Andy Murray - Olympic and USO champion! :)
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2012, 02:21 PM »
Those are really interesting stats - as with the Masters series tallies, Andy's right up there with the greats of the game. The differences is in slam wins and hopefully that will start to change soon.
Federer's stats are amazing - so consistent, and to still be regularly making slam semis at 30 years old is impressive. I hope Andy has just a long career at the top of the game.
IP Logged
lashurst
Veteran
Posts: 7,070
Gender:
Location: Norway
Murray Mad
Show donations
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2012, 03:36 PM »
Quote from: Katie on January 24, 2012, 02:21 PM
Those are really interesting stats - as with the Masters series tallies, Andy's right up there with the greats of the game. The differences is in slam wins and hopefully that will start to change soon.
Federer's stats are amazing - so consistent, and to still be regularly making slam semis at 30 years old is impressive. I hope Andy has just a long career at the top of the game.
I must admit that is so true. Federer is in a class on his own, whether we like it (him) or not.
Andy is playing with the big boys now.
IP Logged
Sir Panda
Murraymaniac
Posts: 31,170
Gender:
Location: Right behind you.
Misunderstood genius.
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2012, 04:37 PM »
Federer.
IP Logged
curtis71
Junior
Posts: 189
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2012, 05:17 PM »
Quote from: lashurst on January 24, 2012, 03:36 PM
I must admit that is so true. Federer is in a class on his own, whether we like it (him) or not.
Andy is playing with the big boys now.
correction: WAS in a class on his own, he is now no better than any other player in the top four
IP Logged
dave_ladder
Newbie
Posts: 59
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2012, 07:38 PM »
Quote from: Lurking on January 24, 2012, 04:26 AM
Borg/Mcenroe/Connors/Agassi missed Slams by choice, so there streaks aren't as long as they could/should/would be in this era.
It's a fair point, although you could also say that's another reason why this era has been so difficult for a player like Murray to win a slam. In the past sometimes the top players didn't play in slams, whereas in the modern era you pretty much have Nadal, Federer and Djokovic at every slam barring very occasional injuries like the one Nadal had in 2009.
IP Logged
Grabcopy
Top Seed
Posts: 5,618
Gender:
Location: Catatonia
I know I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2012, 07:46 PM »
Quote from: dave_ladder on January 24, 2012, 07:38 PM
It's a fair point, although you could also say that's another reason why this era has been so difficult for a player like Murray to win a slam. In the past sometimes the top players didn't play in slams, whereas in the modern era you pretty much have Nadal, Federer and Djokovic at every slam barring very occasional injuries like the one Nadal had in 2009.
Yep, back in the 70s, top players didn't go down to Oz unless they'd won the other three. McEnroe was lamenting how many slams he could have won if he'd played in Australia. You have to say, when the Australian Open features winners like Brian Teacher and Johan Kriek, it loses a little cred. It's a little skewed that Johan Kriek has 2 slams to his name and Andy has none.
IP Logged
robbie
Seed
Posts: 4,941
Show donations
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2012, 08:27 PM »
^Was money the reason?
IP Logged
Grabcopy
Top Seed
Posts: 5,618
Gender:
Location: Catatonia
I know I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2012, 09:10 PM »
No, distance. It was a brutal trip (still is). Also, the tourney needed modernising. It was played on poor-quality grass at Kooyong Stadium, which was looking pretty grotty.
Also, a major factor was that it came at the end of the season (December). Like I say, top players would only go there if they'd won the other three that year. With it moving to January in 1987, if they wanted a calendar-year slam, they had to start it in Oz in January. Smart move.
The move to the New Year was followed by the shift to Melbourne Park in 1988 and it's had a fair bit of cred since then.
IP Logged
Alis
ATP Level
Posts: 2,147
Gender:
Location: Southern Hebrides
Re: Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2012, 09:32 PM »
Wasn't the Aussie Open the only time John Lloyd got to a final? I always thought that was a fantastic result for him but if most of the big names weren't there it would explain it.
IP Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
4
5
MurraysWorld Discussions
>
Murray Community
>
Andy Talk
>
Consecutive Slam Semi-Finals
« previous
next »
Powered by SMF
|
SMF © 2006, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.143 seconds with 26 queries. (
Pretty URLs
adds 0.04s, 2q)
Loading...