Home Search Calendar Help Login Register
Did you miss your activation email?
MurraysWorld Discussions  >  Murray Community  >  Andy Talk  >  How likely is it that Andy will never win a grand slam? 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Reply
Author

How likely is it that Andy will never win a grand slam?

 (Read 1184 times)
blueberryhill
Veteran
******
Posts: 9,829



Re: How likely is it that Andy will never win a grand slam? « Reply #15 on: July 06, 2011, 04:34 PM »
Reply

Was thinking as well, so far he's faced Federer twice and an on fire Nole whose first slam win was against Tsonga. Andy needs lady luck to be on his side.
IP Logged
clementine
Satellite Level
**
Posts: 267



Re: How likely is it that Andy will never win a grand slam? « Reply #16 on: July 06, 2011, 05:12 PM »
Reply

The whole question of whether or not Andy will win a grand slam has reached fever pitch.  Every time he steps out on court he is carrying the hopes and aspirations of so many fans, pundits, media moguls and sponsors that he just has to be a bag of nerves - he wouldn't be human if he wasn't.  The other players are very aware of the extraordinary pressure he's under at Wimbledon and all of them fancy their chances against him, on the one hand saying he'll definitely win a slam and on the other plotting their tactics to take him out.  They resent the ridiculous amount of media coverage Andy attracts and relish the chance to play the home-grown hero in a high profile   showcase match - little wonder Andy finds himself up against opponents punching well above their weight.

Andy is bombarded with advice from all corners, everyone seems to want a piece of the action when it comes to just how he should go about the business of winning.   No other player, indeed sportsman, is subjected to this feeding frenzy of OTT attention.  Wimbledon is insane, the pressure is a joke and even an exceptionally cool, laid-back guy like Andy Murray cannot but be effected by it, it's just not humanly possible.  There are pressures for every player but nothing like the levels Andy has to deal with.  He  needs a break from all this pressure and expectation and his natural ability will be allowed to flourish.  Easier said than done of course, but maybe the press could just cut him some slack and lay off him just a wee bit.  Match reports and analysis is one thing but the past couple of weeks have thrown up so many tennis hangers-on coming up with their very own take on Andy and what they think he should do, most of them, it has to be said, serial losers. 

Andy's timing is not good.  He is playing fantastic tennis in an era of living-breathing legends, Federer, Nadal and Djokovic and at a time when the Internet ensures phenomenal global broadcasting of every little scrap of information about him.  He is a brilliant tennis player and doesn't want to be a celebrity, he is uncomfortable with the sideshow circus that goes with the territory.  Unfortunately for Andy his reluctance with the paps makes him all the more appealing and he is a sponsor's dream - William and Kate came to watch him at Wimbledon when just a few weeks back some two billion people throughout the world had been watching them.  He's just got it, whether he likes it or not.  Whether or not Andy wins a grand slam has almost become more of a talking point than the tennis. 

IP Logged
Leflipper
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


Re: How likely is it that Andy will never win a grand slam? « Reply #17 on: July 07, 2011, 05:12 PM »
Reply

When you take a look at the one to ones with Rafa, Djoko and Federer, Andy seems to have won more against them in 2008/9. He seems to have the upper hand with Federer except in Grand Slam finals. My point is that when he was fairly new to the top he seemed to play more instinctive tennis, he was more carefree, to me it seems like he calculates a lot more rather than doing what he feels like, he seems to have lost some of his cheekiness and sneakiness - he doesn't play liberating tennis. For me he played his best tennis in 2008/9 and I don't really know if he has improved. It's hard to gauge. Sometimes when you want something so badly it doesn't happen- so close yet so far, and I think he is really feeling frustrated and that is mirrored in his game when he plays the big events against the top guys. There is certainly a margin between him and those below, Del Potro and a few others will be hot on his heels though. I really hope he does win a grand slam. He is amazing, I just want him to play his best tennis and to acheive that I'm not sure that it's about the training.
IP Logged
Johnny Handsome
Futures Level
**
Posts: 482

Gender: Male
Location: york


Re: How likely is it that Andy will never win a grand slam? « Reply #18 on: July 07, 2011, 06:25 PM »
Reply

I think if he never wins a slam we'l look back to to australia in 2010 and say that was his time. Djokovic was nowhere to be seen, Nadal was carrying and injury. Yes Federer was sublime in the final, but with his record against him and how well he had been playing during the tournament the final should have been a lot closer than it was. I believe he will get to another Grand slam final, but as for winning i dont know, i just don't know any more.
IP Logged
Muzzamad
Newbie
*
Posts: 71

Gender: Female
Location: Aberdeen


Re: How likely is it that Andy will never win a grand slam? « Reply #19 on: July 09, 2011, 08:45 AM »
Reply

I would be happy just to see him beat Rafa, Fed or Nole in any tournament. Not necessarily in the final. If he can start to do that I think a slam would follow. He obviously has the ability, I wish he would just fully believe in himself. Seeing what Nole has done in the last year gives me a great deal of hope Andy can do the same. Why does Rafa always play his best against Andy....very frustrating.
IP Logged
Ruthie
Veteran
******
Posts: 8,345

Gender: Female
Location: East Midlands


Touch the sky - and touch it he did.

Re: How likely is it that Andy will never win a grand slam? « Reply #20 on: July 09, 2011, 04:59 PM »
Reply

 
The whole question of whether or not Andy will win a grand slam has reached fever pitch.  Every time he steps out on court he is carrying the hopes and aspirations of so many fans, pundits, media moguls and sponsors that he just has to be a bag of nerves - he wouldn't be human if he wasn't.  The other players are very aware of the extraordinary pressure he's under at Wimbledon and all of them fancy their chances against him, on the one hand saying he'll definitely win a slam and on the other plotting their tactics to take him out.  They resent the ridiculous amount of media coverage Andy attracts and relish the chance to play the home-grown hero in a high profile   showcase match - little wonder Andy finds himself up against opponents punching well above their weight.

Andy is bombarded with advice from all corners, everyone seems to want a piece of the action when it comes to just how he should go about the business of winning.   No other player, indeed sportsman, is subjected to this feeding frenzy of OTT attention.  Wimbledon is insane, the pressure is a joke and even an exceptionally cool, laid-back guy like Andy Murray cannot but be effected by it, it's just not humanly possible.  There are pressures for every player but nothing like the levels Andy has to deal with.  He  needs a break from all this pressure and expectation and his natural ability will be allowed to flourish.  Easier said than done of course, but maybe the press could just cut him some slack and lay off him just a wee bit.  Match reports and analysis is one thing but the past couple of weeks have thrown up so many tennis hangers-on coming up with their very own take on Andy and what they think he should do, most of them, it has to be said, serial losers. 

Andy's timing is not good.  He is playing fantastic tennis in an era of living-breathing legends, Federer, Nadal and Djokovic and at a time when the Internet ensures phenomenal global broadcasting of every little scrap of information about him.  He is a brilliant tennis player and doesn't want to be a celebrity, he is uncomfortable with the sideshow circus that goes with the territory.  Unfortunately for Andy his reluctance with the paps makes him all the more appealing and he is a sponsor's dream - William and Kate came to watch him at Wimbledon when just a few weeks back some two billion people throughout the world had been watching them.  He's just got it, whether he likes it or not.  Whether or not Andy wins a grand slam has almost become more of a talking point than the tennis. 


Good posting clementine and also good to read the posts from the supernewbies to whom welcome!  I believe Andy still can win a slam. Whether or not he does depends on so many factors.  If he doesn't, I agree he will then go down as the best man not to have won one. And it would be such a shame as it's what he wants so much and it would mean he hadn't fully fulfilled his marvellous potential.  I also agree that when he gets to a GS final it's as if he wants it too much and that shackles him from playing the tennis he is capable of.  Ultimately I believe the pressure he puts on himself has more impact than the pressure from the media.
IP Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Reply 
« previous next »