Home Search Calendar Help Login Register
Did you miss your activation email?
MurraysWorld Discussions  >  Murray Community  >  Andy Talk  >  Wimbledon QF : Murray v Nadal 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Poll
Question: Winner or Weiner
Muzz in 3 - 2 (6.7%)
Muzz in 4 - 1 (3.3%)
Muzz in 5 - 16 (53.3%)
Rafa in 3 - 4 (13.3%)
Rafa in 4 - 6 (20%)
Rafa in 5 - 1 (3.3%)
Total Voters: 30

Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 ... 40 Go Down Reply
Author

Wimbledon QF : Murray v Nadal

 (Read 11518 times)
Tommy
World No 1
*******
Posts: 12,842

Gender: Male
Location: Banbury, Oxfordshire


woo hoo

Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #495 on: July 02, 2008, 07:43 PM »
Reply

EER!!! 2 all
IP Logged
sengamac
Challenger Level
**
Posts: 1,125

Gender: Female
Location: Edinburgh


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #496 on: July 02, 2008, 07:43 PM »
Reply


The thing is, Fuzzy would have so much more fun over at AM, they're so much more fanboyish. Then again, he'd probably be banned in an instant.  Think


He/she/it would be hung drawn and quartered over there.
IP Logged
Quackers
Murraymaniac
**********
Posts: 22,035

Gender: Female


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #497 on: July 02, 2008, 07:44 PM »
Reply

lmao
IP Logged
Quackers
Murraymaniac
**********
Posts: 22,035

Gender: Female


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #498 on: July 02, 2008, 07:44 PM »
Reply

Please don't lose your serve Andy while we watch Mark pray
IP Logged
Quackers
Murraymaniac
**********
Posts: 22,035

Gender: Female


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #499 on: July 02, 2008, 07:45 PM »
Reply

When the court is wide open hit it there, Andy!
IP Logged
sengamac
Challenger Level
**
Posts: 1,125

Gender: Female
Location: Edinburgh


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #500 on: July 02, 2008, 07:46 PM »
Reply

How's Andy looking - dejected or pumped up?
IP Logged
Tommy
World No 1
*******
Posts: 12,842

Gender: Male
Location: Banbury, Oxfordshire


woo hoo

Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #501 on: July 02, 2008, 07:46 PM »
Reply

This thread is crazy...Im laughing so much...yet Andy is doing horrible...its really strange.
IP Logged
sengamac
Challenger Level
**
Posts: 1,125

Gender: Female
Location: Edinburgh


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #502 on: July 02, 2008, 07:47 PM »
Reply


This thread is crazy...Im laughing so much...yet Andy is doing horrible...its really strange.


Its called hysteria
IP Logged
fuzzyballs
Challenger Level
*
Posts: 1,021


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #503 on: July 02, 2008, 07:47 PM »
Reply

poor murray, nothing he has is even close to being good enough to compete
IP Logged
Tommy
World No 1
*******
Posts: 12,842

Gender: Male
Location: Banbury, Oxfordshire


woo hoo

Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #504 on: July 02, 2008, 07:48 PM »
Reply

Ah so thats it lol
IP Logged
sengamac
Challenger Level
**
Posts: 1,125

Gender: Female
Location: Edinburgh


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #505 on: July 02, 2008, 07:48 PM »
Reply

I can't watch the match  waiting on new t.v. so relying on this to find out what's happening.  Sounds a bit like a bullfight at the mo
IP Logged
Quackers
Murraymaniac
**********
Posts: 22,035

Gender: Female


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #506 on: July 02, 2008, 07:48 PM »
Reply

Why is he hitting it back to Nadal when the court is wide open???? ranting
IP Logged
Sir Panda
Murraymaniac
**********
Posts: 31,156

Gender: Male
Location: Right behind you.


Misunderstood genius.

Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #507 on: July 02, 2008, 07:48 PM »
Reply

One thing I'm proud of is his temperament, must be so frustrating out there to be playing so poorly after all the hype.
IP Logged
Tommy
World No 1
*******
Posts: 12,842

Gender: Male
Location: Banbury, Oxfordshire


woo hoo

Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #508 on: July 02, 2008, 07:49 PM »
Reply


poor murray, nothing he has is even close to being good enough to compete


And everything you do is good enough to sound pathetic..
IP Logged
Scottie
World No 1
*******
Posts: 10,093

Gender: Male


Re: Murray v Nadal « Reply #509 on: July 02, 2008, 07:49 PM »
Reply

Its on!!!!!
IP Logged
Pages: 1 ... 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 ... 40 Go Up Reply 
« previous next »