Andy Murray vs Ivo Karlovic, Monday, Estimated time - 2:45pm BST - Discuss the match
MurraysWorld  >  Andy Talk  >  US Open QF: Murray vs Cilic
Pages: 1 ... 81 82 83 [84] Reply

US Open QF: Murray vs Cilic

Quote

Umm, just to clarify, maybe I'm not in obviously funny mode today, but my tongue was set rather firmly in my cheek when I did my post and mentioned a roof on Ashe. It wasn't really meant to provoke a serious discussion on the topic.
IP Logged
Quote

Here's a pic :


Ashe.  I love that court!
Roof will rune everything beautiful Ashe has...
IP Logged
Quote

Armstrong is lightning-quick. Andy himself said he hates it because it's "twenty times quicker" than the other courts. How can this be allowed?

That statement is pretty exaggerated even if it comes from Andy. Yesterday's conditions were heavy which made the courts play slower. The Mac brothers and Brad talked about it all throughout different matches and it remained heavy all night. So Armstrong wasn't playing any faster; in fact, a bit slower than usual. Also, if this was true than it doesn't explain why Andy typically almost always struggle against Cilic. Dropped the 1st at the Australian Open as well (no Armstrong there). And also, how do you explain his similar performance at AA in the 1st round? He dropped his serve several times in the 1st set alone. The difference was his opponent wasn't as good as Cilic so he couldn't get ahead like Cilic.

This sudden drop of level was a combination of the facts that, one, Andy is a notorious slow starter; two, he didn't like the sudden change of court but not the court itself as he likes a bigger crowd/attention etc.; third, Cilic always gives him trouble and he doesn't like playing Cilic, Because of those reasons, he couldn't get into the match until it was so late that he had to realize that it was slipping away from him. And it doesn't make you comfortable knowing that Cilic has beaten him here once before. And of course, Andy loves this event so he wasn't going to go away so easily. All that pumped him up eventually during the 2nd set when he was 5-1 behind. The realization and subsequently the transition came in the 7th game of the 2nd set. Cilic realized it as well once he saw Andy acting differently and going for his shots and was beaten mentally right there. He knows Andy's the better player and can only beat him if he has some sort of injury or if he's off form and Andy's body language and his negative attitude did give him some hope, but once Andy got a good hold of himself and got into the match, it was all over for Cilic. The result was never in doubt after that.
IP Logged
Quote

welcome Bladder. Following Murray is not for people with dodgy tickers , but at least you won't die of boredom. Last night was a match to remember.But all worked out well Andy's  qualified for the O2 and is only 226 points behind Nadal and is in the semis US Open.Worth a few heart flutters surely.
 Now to cheer him on against Berdych.

 yes

















IP Logged
Quote

That statement is pretty exaggerated even if it comes from Andy. Yesterday's conditions were heavy which made the courts play slower. The Mac brothers and Brad talked about it all throughout different matches and it remained heavy all night. So Armstrong wasn't playing any faster; in fact, a bit slower than usual. Also, if this was true than it doesn't explain why Andy typically almost always struggle against Cilic. Dropped the 1st at the Australian Open as well (no Armstrong there). And also, how do you explain his similar performance at AA in the 1st round? He dropped his serve several times in the 1st set alone. The difference was his opponent wasn't as good as Cilic so he couldn't get ahead like Cilic.

This sudden drop of level was a combination of the facts that, one, Andy is a notorious slow starter; two, he didn't like the sudden change of court but not the court itself as he likes a bigger crowd/attention etc.; third, Cilic always gives him trouble and he doesn't like playing Cilic, Because of those reasons, he couldn't get into the match until it was so late that he had to realize that it was slipping away from him. And it doesn't make you comfortable knowing that Cilic has beaten him here once before. And of course, Andy loves this event so he wasn't going to go away so easily. All that pumped him up eventually during the 2nd set when he was 5-1 behind. The realization and subsequently the transition came in the 7th game of the 2nd set. Cilic realized it as well once he saw Andy acting differently and going for his shots and was beaten mentally right there. He knows Andy's the better player and can only beat him if he has some sort of injury or if he's off form and Andy's body language and his negative attitude did give him some hope, but once Andy got a good hold of himself and got into the match, it was all over for Cilic. The result was never in doubt after that.

I think what Andy said was that the court was 20% quicker not 20 times quicker.
IP Logged
Quote

^^ That was Nigel's personal touch. He just can't help it. lol
[ Last edit by Emma Jean September 07, 2012, 09:20 PM ] IP Logged
Quote

^Why?
IP Logged
Quote

^ why wat?
IP Logged
Quote

So jealous of Nige?
IP Logged
Quote

It's pretty simple. If Armstrong was really 20 times or even 20% faster than AA, then Andy would have seen a lost by now; that is, if it's at all true that he's a better player on slower surface. Instead he came back from 1-5 down in the 2nd only to bagel Cilic in the 4th to snatch a pretty comfortable victory in the end. therefore, the logic couldn't be any more flawed because there are two very contradictory elements going on in that statement. And if you understand that, then you will be able to see that it was never about Nige.
IP Logged
Quote

yeahhhhhhhhhh
IP Logged
Quote

 :cmonandy   clap  :comone Andy 
IP Logged
Pages: 1 ... 81 82 83 [84] Reply