Home Login Register
MurraysWorld  >  Tennis Talk  >  British Tennis  >  Henman vs. Srichaphan
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Reply

Henman vs. Srichaphan

Reply

cmon yeah YYYYYYYEEEEEEEESSSSSSS!!!!!!!

Just checking last year's match with Andy v Paradorn and it took Andy 3 sets to beat him at the same tournie!
IP Logged
Reply

From the beeb website:

Henman 7-6 4-6 2-0 Srichaphan
Henman claims the opening two points of the game and digs deep for a low volley to earn a couple of break points. A magnficent backhand passing shot by the Briton to give him the game at the end of the best rally of the match is greeted by a pumped fist of delight and the crowd are silent.


cmon yeah Tim!

Henman 7-6 4-6 3-0 Srichaphan
Srichaphan seems to have lost some of his bounce and not even the presence of Miss Universe at courtside can help. Henman holds comfortably to love.


[ Last edit by Bevc September 29, 2006, 02:59 PM ] IP Logged
arka
Reply

^ Haha. roflmao

Game point for Henman.
IP Logged
Reply

There going to take me away shortly!  I've never spoken so much to my computer!  Whistle

I hope that Tim can hear me!

cmon yeah Tim!  You can do it!
IP Logged
Reply

Gosh that service game from Paradorn was over quick! shocking  Is he improving?
IP Logged
Reply

Argh!  I can't bear to look!

My nerves are shot to pieces! nervous nervous

Edit: should that be bare and not bear?

Brain dead at 2.10 am!

You beauty!  Get in there!  cmon yeah Tim!
IP Logged
Reply

Tim to serve for the match! nervous

Please don't fluff it up! pray
IP Logged
Reply

SERVE IT OUT PLEASE TIM!
IP Logged
arka
Reply

Tim. pray


This one will do his ranking so much good.
IP Logged
Reply

Oh !"££$$$%%^%^
IP Logged
Reply

Oh !"££$$$%%^%^

Something stronger than Bummocks!!!
IP Logged
Reply

stretcher

I can't look!  I feel a doctor who moment coming on *reaches for the cushion*
IP Logged
Reply

you stupid chickenboy!! ranting
IP Logged
Reply

Something stronger than Bummocks!!!

yes
IP Logged
Reply

you stupid chickenboy!! ranting

 shocking
IP Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Reply