What a chance that would of been had Laura beaten Kanepi and Lisicki.
Radwanska, Lisicki, Bartoli and Flipkens are the semifinalists this year. All never won a Slam before.
Yeah, what a chance if she'd beaten Kanepi, Lisicki, Radwanska and Bartoli. She would be in a good position then. Because it would have been well straightforward to win all of those matches.
I don't this whole 'what if' thing. Laura was only favourite (in reality, not with the bloody bookies) for one of her matches. She did very well to get to where she did. She never had a great chance of winning Wimbledon like some of the media seemed to believe, because right now she's nowhere near good (or consistent enough). She should be praised for getting where she did, but instead after every win it was always immediately 'what if this happens' 'should win this match' 'could win the whole thing'.