|
Sarah_
|
He's really a teenage mutant ninja turtle... Yes he's teenage He' mutant (look at his muscles  ) He fights as a ninja at the matches And he's turtle(Rafael  ) Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cannot be compared to anyone. They are in a league of there own. they could beat federer.
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Neil
|
He's really a teenage mutant ninja turtle... Yes he's teenage He' mutant (look at his muscles  ) He fights as a ninja at the matches And he's turtle(Rafael  ) Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cannot be compared to anyone. They are in a league of there own. they could beat federer.  NO ONE can beat Federer! (not for a couple of years at least)
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
deedee
|
Oh, be quiet... Someone will, SOON!!! Nalbandian's the man!
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
davidB
|
actually nadal is a tmnt because he did beat federer
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ljsmall
|
Both have. As has Tommy Haas. It's definately on a fluke result basis. And I don't think anyone'll have him on grass. Only lost one set at wimbly last year. He could potentially do it in straight sets this year, Wouldn't that be something!
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
arka
|
Do you want to know who is really gonna give Federer a run for his money??? Its Andy Murray.
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ljsmall
|
I absolutely agree with you. He's got the game and the mental stamina to do it. Just get the consistancy on track and he'll definately give him a good bit of competition. More than Roddick ever did.
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah_
|
Why have all these threads popped back up in my 'new replies to posts' section... 
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark
Murraymaniac

Posts: 52,156
Gender:
Location: London
|
Possibly because it does that when threads are unread which show on the first page of the board index and when it gets to knocked to page 2 it probably no longer will show up  Not sure though but I have a vague memory of that being the case.
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah_
|
I don't get you...
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark
Murraymaniac

Posts: 52,156
Gender:
Location: London
|
I edited my post straight after because it was worded dreadfully  Do you still not understand?
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah_
|
Ah yes. I just re-read. I still don't really get it. Are you saying that someone has read this thread so it has appeared in my new replies to posts because it's active again?
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
Mark
Murraymaniac

Posts: 52,156
Gender:
Location: London
|
No, I'm saying that when you enter one of the forum boards, all unread threads/posts that are not showing on the first page of that board do not get counted on that unread feature you are talking about.
The reason this thread may have suddenly appeared in that feature is because it's now showing of the first page of the British Tennis board where before it was not showing on the first page of any board but instead in some of the old pages of Tennis Talk.
So, if this thread remained unread and then got pushed onto the second page of the British Tennis board, then it would no longer appear unread with the feature you are using.
^^ The above is just a theory based on a vague memory I have from talking about this sort of thing before so I could be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah_
|
Okay, I think I understand. Danke.
|
|
|
|
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|