You are so dense
If only you actually believed that.
1. It is a fact and not an opinion that Quantum Mechanics have measured the observable Universe. New flash for you clearly.
I didn't dispute that. Learn to read.
2. It is a fact that we don’t know if the Universe is infinite. Saying that ‘it’s most likely infinite’ is highly speculative and intellectually dense.
Then I guess Lawrence Krauss and many other well-respected physicists are intellectually dense
3. It’s also a fact that a planet that supports life is an extremely rare occasion and here’s why:
Again, I didn't dispute that. Can't you read?
(This is of course from the presentation)
If you take the most optimistic scenario to support life on a planet in a Universe and the odds of randomly matching any human DNA would be equal to drawing each Ace of Spade from 1 billion card of decks. (do you now see how rare an event that is?).
Not true. Rare does not mean unlikely, and it certainly doesn't mean "unique". Given what we know about the universe, it would be almost inconceivable for life to have evolved only once, let alone to have never evolved at all.
Therefore, it’s not ‘reasonably’ possible that life was created randomly by any known chemical or physical reactions. It would have to overcome that staggering odds to create just one simple life form and I am not even talking about humans at this point.
Again, you're demonstrating just how narrow your understanding of the world is. Then again, I wouldn't expect anything less from someone who hails the thoroughly discredited Deepak Chopra as one of her intellectual heroes.
Anyway, do me a favour. Stop quoting me. You don’t interest me; you bore me in fact; moreover, I learn nothing from you. If you don’t do that I will simply ignore you.
I'd happily ignore you. Unfortunately, I feel compelled to debunk the nonsense you routinely poison the forum with.