|
Posted on: January 30, 2010, 12:28 PM
Posted by: Mark
|
Agreed, he'll probably be back if Murray loses tomorrow... funny guy  |
|
Posted on: January 30, 2010, 12:21 PM
Posted by: Philip
|
I just had a thought looking at the various threads. I think that Fuzzyball is prowling in wait for Andy to make a mistake and then pounce with another similar article here. I truly hope that Andy will make his final breakthrough and deliver Fuzzyball to the scrapyard for good tomorrow  . |
|
Posted on: August 25, 2009, 12:19 PM
Posted by: MurrayRocks
|
Losng to Verdasco at the AO was dissapointing regardless of his excellent form, and Murrays illness. But losing to Gonzalez in the QF's at the Roland Garros is no big shame. Also theres no shame in losing to Roddick in the semis at Wimbledon. Murray didnt play his best and Roddick was on form and it was still a very close match points wise. What if Roddick had gone on to beat Federer. He very almost did. What would you say about that? Surely Fed should have destroyed him easily going by their h2h. So far this year Murray has equaled his AO best, beaten his RG and W best. So is that not improvement?
Completely agree with you , Roddick was the better player at Wimby against Fed ...... i 'm sure Muzza will bounce back the sooner the better of course and there is no obligation for him to win a slam this year right ? Let's him breath and win it when it will be ready , remembers guys Fed was a late bloomer and see where he is now , Andy could be the same .... good luck scottish chouchou ! |
|
Posted on: August 25, 2009, 11:31 AM
Posted by: fedexpress
|
Seems like Federer is pretty unstoppable at the moment, I'd be happy to put my money on him making the final (and probably winning!) at Flushing Meadows, regardless of the new addition to his private life! Could Murray potentially be the man to join him? He says himself he's near the top of his game at the moment, but I'm still not so sure he's ready to win a Slam... Isobel ACE Tennis Magazine http://www.facebook.com/pages/ACE-Tennis-Magazine/50375017857 |
|
Posted on: July 07, 2009, 04:10 PM
Posted by: Scottie
|
|
Losng to Verdasco at the AO was dissapointing regardless of his excellent form, and Murrays illness. But losing to Gonzalez in the QF's at the Roland Garros is no big shame. Also theres no shame in losing to Roddick in the semis at Wimbledon. Murray didnt play his best and Roddick was on form and it was still a very close match points wise. What if Roddick had gone on to beat Federer. He very almost did. What would you say about that? Surely Fed should have destroyed him easily going by their h2h. So far this year Murray has equaled his AO best, beaten his RG and W best. So is that not improvement?
|
|
Posted on: July 07, 2009, 01:56 PM
Posted by: ljsmall
|
|
I was screaming as loud as anyone on Sunday for Andy Roddick. I have to say, it felt a little strange to be shouting 'Come on Andy' at the TV when Murray wasn't playing. But a match between the two of them, no contest who I'll be shouting for!
|
|
Posted on: July 07, 2009, 12:56 PM
Posted by: Daisy
|
Yeah, if they meet at flushing meadows oor Andy will anhialate him. Revenge is sweet. Home slam dumping for a home slam dumping!
<BIGSMILE> I really like Andy R, and he's on the slippery slope of his career - Andy M has oodles of times left ...... Get a Texas flag (Roddick's State of residence) and wave it in your left hand and a Saltire and wave it in your right ............. go-on ..... do it for me ..... and get Amy to take a pic ....  |
|
Posted on: July 07, 2009, 12:53 PM
Posted by: ljsmall
|
|
Yeah, if they meet at flushing meadows oor Andy will anhialate him. Revenge is sweet. Home slam dumping for a home slam dumping!
|
|
Posted on: July 07, 2009, 12:49 PM
Posted by: Daisy
|
Fuzz has just given it the golden touch. Said Murray would never make top 100/top 50/top 20/top 10/ top 5/win a title/win a masters/win anything/defend and points/return from injury etc etc etc. All presented with good arguments, all wrong! So it looks like Andy's winning US!!!!
Watch out for the other Andy !!  |
|
Posted on: July 07, 2009, 12:32 PM
Posted by: ljsmall
|
|
Fuzz has just given it the golden touch. Said Murray would never make top 100/top 50/top 20/top 10/ top 5/win a title/win a masters/win anything/defend and points/return from injury etc etc etc. All presented with good arguments, all wrong! So it looks like Andy's winning US!!!!
|
|
Posted on: July 07, 2009, 01:35 AM
Posted by: Tommy
|
So you think he'll never win a slam?
Fuzz thinks he'll never win a set. |
|
Posted on: July 07, 2009, 12:23 AM
Posted by: drchef
|
With Federer back to his best,
Did I miss something, have you been watching a different Federer from me? |
|
Posted on: July 06, 2009, 11:39 PM
Posted by: TCK
|
|
Honestly I think fuzzyballs has a point on this one. I always thought that Andy would win the final IF he got there, but figured all it took was for an underdog to give an elevated performance for him to be knocked out before, and nowadays Murray's reputation makes almost all his opponents underdogs. What's worse is that he got away with it against Wawrinka and still proceeded to let it happen again.
Indeed, this is far from the first time it's happened to him and I'm certainly more sceptical about his chances coming up to the US Open than I was pre-Wimbledon, where I put him as joint-favourite.
Still think he'll nab a slam or two eventually though.
|
|
Posted on: July 03, 2009, 11:14 PM
Posted by: Annie Binannie
|
Oh Fuzzys back! Man I missed you  |
|
Posted on: July 03, 2009, 11:11 PM
Posted by: Mark
|
Mourning the death of Michael Jackson
I'll take that one!  |
|
Posted on: July 03, 2009, 10:24 PM
Posted by: Elly
|
Here are a few suggestions...
Headache
Sore foot
Had the trots
Swine flu
Bubonic plague
The Rapture
Abducted by aliens
Moring the death of Michael Jackson
Here's another suggestion You **** off! haha we love you really....  |
|
Posted on: July 03, 2009, 10:14 PM
Posted by: fuzzyballs
|
AO = ill
FO = clay
USO = first slam final, played two previous days
I'll give you today, that one was an anomaly, but you're seeing it in black and white.
Here are a few suggestions... Headache Sore foot Had the trots Swine flu Bubonic plague The Rapture Abducted by aliens Mourning the death of Michael Jackson |
|
Posted on: July 03, 2009, 10:05 PM
Posted by: Joe
|
Fair enough.
Did his AO performance convince you that this view in any more erroneous, how about the FO? Even the slam final he made he disgraced himself with a woeful effort against Federer. He's beaten Federer many times since, but when it really mattered once again he fell to bits. Are you seeing a pattern emerge?
AO = ill FO = clay USO = first slam final, played two previous days I'll give you today, that one was an anomaly, but you're seeing it in black and white. |
|
Posted on: July 03, 2009, 09:45 PM
Posted by: fuzzyballs
|
No, it hasn't.
Though todays performance was disappointing, I was pleased with his 12 day performance as a whole.
I agree, that the age thing is being a little tiresome, 22 is not young in tennis terms. However, his body is still to peak, I think he will be playing his best tennis from 2010-2013.
Federer will disappear in less than 24 months time, when the bambino is born, his dedication levels will plummet. As for Nadal, I'm not even sure if his knees will get better, tendonitis doesn't disappear.
Yes, there will be new challengers, but I still believe Murray is good enough to win a GS, and several at that. Players past and present hold the same opinion, you are in the minority Fuzzy.
Andy has only lost 7 times this year now, what do you think of that form?
But 3 of those losses have been in slams. It says a lot about your belief in Murray they you are factoring in Federer losing motivation and Nadal remaining below par for Murray to win slams. The fact is Federer mops up slams with so little effort thee days that I think he's going to hang around a long time. |
|
Posted on: July 03, 2009, 09:40 PM
Posted by: Sir Panda
|
Has today's performance convinced you that this belief is more or less erroneous?
No, it hasn't. Though todays performance was disappointing, I was pleased with his 12 day performance as a whole. I agree, that the age thing is being a little tiresome, 22 is not young in tennis terms. However, his body is still to peak, I think he will be playing his best tennis from 2010-2013. Federer will disappear in less than 24 months time, when the bambino is born, his dedication levels will plummet. As for Nadal, I'm not even sure if his knees will get better, tendonitis doesn't disappear. Yes, there will be new challengers, but I still believe Murray is good enough to win a GS, and several at that. Players past and present hold the same opinion, you are in the minority Fuzzy. Andy has only lost 7 times this year now, what do you think of that form? |
