I think it quite funny and sad that in all the articles being written at the moment are saying' Andy Murray's ex Coach to coach Tomas Berdych, up to now they spoke of Dani as Andy's hitting partner and assisant to Lendl when he wasn't present.' Andy was the one who kept pointing out that he was his coach when he accompanied him to tournaments when Lendl and Amelie were not there. Dani will probably be quoted as another coach who Andy has gone through. As far as I can see there is no consistency by the press and media, and they will use every rod they can to hit Andy with. Do they think we are stupid, or as stupid as they are!!!
It's quite depressing if you let it get to you. First they claim Andy fired Dani - what an idiot. Then it's Dani left Andy - he must have deserved it. Same with Lendl etc etc. Yet, he's also wrong to keep Amelie.
At the end of the day, newspapers like a headline, and a bit of friction and judgement gets more clicks than straight facts. It's often not the journalist who wrote the article and knows the subject, that picks the eventual headline, so I try not to hold it against them. Yet some of them do seem to swing from judging Andy for what they've assumed him to do, then judging him for the opposite, when that turns out to be the case, without any hint of personal shame.
Terms like "sacked" and "dropped" have been banded about a lot lately, and they are just not appropriate.