Out of idle curiously, what exactly is gleeful about the report?
I'm certainly not happy about the result, but nor do I care an awful lot. I've long since accepted that Murray is closer, consistency wise, to the rest of the top 100 than he is to the top 3.
By that I mean he enjoys periods of brilliant play and great results, interspersed with early exits and poor performances.
He wouldn't have posted on this site for so long if he wasn't a genuine fan. It's just his way of coping. He's the opposite of Emma Jean, who must be on lithium or something.
Correct on all counts. I like supporting a high profile British player, firstly because that tiny nationalistic sliver in me enjoys it and secondly because Murray is indirectly encouraging kids to take up tennis. Which is a great thing.