'It was a strange match, in which the scoreline — particularly the first set — didn’t reflect the extent to which Murray seemed to be dominant, while at one and the same time, not playing particularly well. The defending champion’s forehand flickered in and out...'
Hannah Wilks? Hannah Wilks? Who the hell is Hannah Wilks? Get Tignor on the case.http://www.tennis.com/news/2012/10/shanghai-murray-d-federer/39762/#.UHnjZ2enKSo
Hannah Wilks is ... well, a frequent contributor to tennis.com - http://www.tennis.com/news/list/hannah-wilks/
Can also be followed on Twitter - https://twitter.com/newballsplease
- where she's intriguingly described as a "Lapsed blogger. Not Sue Barker." Certainly from her photo there is a resemblance to Sue, so have people been thinking Hannah Wilks is Sue Barker's pseudonym? Don't think she's a PseudoBarker though.
Had a look at her tweets. Very strange some of them - Hannah Wilks [email protected]
"Yep. RT @scoobschris: Roger will hold, Andy will crack and Roger will win 46 60 60. Book it." "Federer up 40-0 and Murray finds his cross-court forehand again. This match ... it puzzles me." "Out of nowhere, a break for Murray. He hasn't even played that well but that's incredible mental resilience."