Home Search Calendar Help Login Register
Did you miss your activation email?
MurraysWorld Discussions  >  General Community  >  Read-the-Round  >  RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Reply
Author

RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13

 (Read 465 times)
Grabcopy
Veteran
*
Posts: 7,100

Gender: Male
Location: Catatonia


I know I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?

RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « on: April 16, 2013, 09:12 PM »
Reply

Melzer v Almagro
Djokovic v Youzhny
Wawrinka v Montanes
Gulbis v Monaco
Roger-Vasselin v Murray

Deadline 12pm

BANKER
IP Logged
Grabcopy
Veteran
*
Posts: 7,100

Gender: Male
Location: Catatonia


I know I'm paranoid. But am I paranoid enough?

Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #1 on: April 16, 2013, 09:14 PM »
Reply

Almagro in 2
Djokovic in 3
Wawrinka in 2
Gulbis in 2
Murray in 2 BANK
IP Logged
Connor
Grand Slam Champion
********
Posts: 15,745

Gender: Male
Location: Great Britain


The great British player will be back!

Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #2 on: April 16, 2013, 09:16 PM »
Reply

Almagro in 2
Nole in 2 B!
Waw in 2
Gulbis in 3
Murray in 2
IP Logged
Tessie
ATP Level
***
Posts: 2,013

Gender: Female
Location: The South


Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #3 on: April 16, 2013, 09:27 PM »
Reply

Almagro in 3
Novak in 2
Montanes in 3
Gulbis in 3
Andy in 2 bank.
IP Logged
drchef
Challenger Level
**
Posts: 916

Gender: Male
Location: Duns


"Corey, Trevor.....Smokes, let's go!"

Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #4 on: April 16, 2013, 09:28 PM »
Reply

Almagro 2
Djokovic 2
Wawrinka 3
Gulbis 3
Murray 2 BANK
IP Logged
wimbledonwestie
ATP Level
***
Posts: 2,937

Gender: Female
Location: Glasgow


Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #5 on: April 16, 2013, 09:31 PM »
Reply

 Almagro in 3
Djokovic in 2
Wawrinka in 2
 Monaco in 3
 Murray in 2 bank

IP Logged
mina
Newbie
*
Posts: 79

Gender: Male


Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #6 on: April 16, 2013, 09:39 PM »
Reply

what bank means
IP Logged
Hazybear
Grand Slam Champion
********
Posts: 13,849

Gender: Female
Location: Livingston


Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #7 on: April 16, 2013, 09:40 PM »
Reply


Almagro in 3
Djokovic in 2
Wawrinka in 2
Gulbis in 3
Murray in 2 Bank
IP Logged
CoolDude
Futures Level
**
Posts: 438



us open champion 2012

Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #8 on: April 16, 2013, 10:00 PM »
Reply

Almagro in 2
Djokovic in 3 (Could see slight sign of injury here)
Wawrinka in 2
Gulbis in 3
Murray in 2 Bank

also to answer mina - bank means that you believe they will win in number of sets you said and so get more points for your bank being right than normal
IP Logged
mina
Newbie
*
Posts: 79

Gender: Male


Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #9 on: April 16, 2013, 10:06 PM »
Reply

thx cooldude

IP Logged
mina
Newbie
*
Posts: 79

Gender: Male


Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #10 on: April 16, 2013, 10:18 PM »
Reply

Almagro in 2
djokovic in 2
Wawrinka in 3
gulbis in 3
murray in 2 bank


IP Logged
sidtypical
Challenger Level
**
Posts: 1,077

Gender: Male
Location: lanarkshire


grrr...

Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #11 on: April 16, 2013, 10:43 PM »
Reply

Almagro in 2
Djokovic in 2
Wawrinka in 2
Monaco in 3
Murray in 2 bank
IP Logged
Katie
ATP Level
*
Posts: 2,847



Andy Murray - US Open and Wimbledon champion! :)

Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #12 on: April 16, 2013, 10:50 PM »
Reply

Almagro in 2
Djokovic in 2
Wawrinka in 2
Monaco in 3
Murray in 2 (Bank)
IP Logged
scotnadian
World No 1
*******
Posts: 12,074

Gender: Female
Location: Toronto, Canada (ex Aberdeen, Scotland)


You (still) ain't seen nothing yet..

Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #13 on: April 16, 2013, 11:35 PM »
Reply

Almagro in 3
Youzhny in 2
Wawrinka in 2 Bank
Monaco in 3
Murray in 2
IP Logged
Geo
Futures Level
**
Posts: 482

Gender: Male
Location: Near Falkirk


Re: RTR Monte Carlo 17/04/13 « Reply #14 on: April 17, 2013, 12:10 AM »
Reply

Almagro in 2
Djokovic in 2
Wawrinka in 2
Gulbis in 3
Murray in 2 Bank
IP Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Reply 
« previous next »