Home Login Register
MurraysWorld  >  Read-the-Round  >  RTR ROME 15/5/13
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Reply

RTR ROME 15/5/13

Reply

Missed the deadline, but these matches haven't started yet, so I'm trusting this is OK.


Yeah it's ok Smile
IP Logged
Reply

Janowicz in 2
Nadal in 2 BANK
Simon in 2
Verdasco in 3
Gulbis in 2


GOAT prediction
IP Logged
Reply

See Andy retired at the end of the second set. Having problems with his left hip managed to win the second set. We have Mr Cowan who as usual is spouting on about Andy's retiral saying he should have played on. What a nasty person he is perhaps he just does not like Andy who I think took the right decision. I do not think he should play in the French open and just concentrate on Wimbledon he was obviously in pain and only pride made him play on in the second set. Not such a happy birthday for Andy.
IP Logged
Reply

GOAT prediction

Fluke.
IP Logged
Reply

Fluke.

Not at all. I also predicted Wigan to beat Citeh in the FA Cup final 1-0.
IP Logged
Reply

I dont care about football.

It was still a fluke. :P
IP Logged
Reply

No, it wasn't.

Bow down to me Sabine.
IP Logged
Reply

Two out of two on the predictions so far! Bamos.
IP Logged
Reply

Stop being like a pair of young kids really it is getting to be irritable.
IP Logged
Reply

No, it wasn't.

Bow down to me Sabine.

In your dreams. :P
IP Logged
Reply

Stop being like a pair of young kids really it is getting to be irritable.

Please excuse one last comment from me.
IP Logged
Reply

Stop being like a pair of young kids really it is getting to be irritable.

Wtf? Am I not allowed to have a bit of banter on here? A little joke?

Alright then.
IP Logged
Reply

Stop being like a pair of young kids really it is getting to be irritable.

Grumpy much? It's obvious they're joking around
IP Logged
Reply

So you don't get grumpy !
IP Logged
Reply

So you don't get grumpy !

I do but normally when it's obvious that people are taking it to seriously and are being annoyingly competitive instead of joking around Wink
IP Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Reply