Home Search Calendar Help Login Register
Did you miss your activation email?
MurraysWorld Discussions  >  General Community  >  Read-the-Round  >  US Open: Matchday 6 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Reply
Author

US Open: Matchday 6

 (Read 516 times)
Allan
Grand Slam Champion
********
Posts: 14,144

Gender: Male
Location: Falkirk, Central Scotland/Edinburgh sometimes


It's 2013!

US Open: Matchday 6 « on: September 05, 2009, 01:03 AM »
Reply

(This is matchday 6. We missed days 4 and 5.  Rolling Eyes doh)

Roger Federer v Lleyton Hewitt

John Isner v Andy Roddick

Fernando Verdasco v Tommy Haas

Philipp Kohlschreiber v Radek Stepanek

Robin Soderling v Sam Querrey


Deadline: 4pm UK time.

IP Logged
MurrayRocks
Veteran
******
Posts: 7,206

Gender: Female
Location: Paris - France


I ♥ my scottish chouchou ...

Re: US Open: Matchday 6 « Reply #1 on: September 05, 2009, 07:43 AM »
Reply

Fed in 3
Roddick in 3
Verdasco in 4
Stepanek in 4
Soderling in 4
IP Logged
netcord
Top Seed
*****
Posts: 5,612

Gender: Male


Miles who?

Re: US Open: Matchday 6 « Reply #2 on: September 05, 2009, 09:07 AM »
Reply

Federer in 3
Roddick in 4
Verdasco in 4
Kohlschreiber in 4
Soderling in 4
IP Logged
Allan
Grand Slam Champion
********
Posts: 14,144

Gender: Male
Location: Falkirk, Central Scotland/Edinburgh sometimes


It's 2013!

Re: US Open: Matchday 6 « Reply #3 on: September 05, 2009, 12:38 PM »
Reply

Federer in 4
Roddick in 4
Verdasco in 5
Kohlschreiber in 4
Querrey in 5
IP Logged
leeroy18
Futures Level
**
Posts: 423

Gender: Male
Location: london


winning ugly

Re: US Open: Matchday 6 « Reply #4 on: September 05, 2009, 12:47 PM »
Reply

Roger Federer in 3
Andy Roddick in 3
Fernando Verdasco in 4
Radek Stepanek in 4
Robin Soderling in 4
IP Logged
Shooting Star
Veteran
******
Posts: 8,328

Gender: Female


Re: US Open: Matchday 6 « Reply #5 on: September 05, 2009, 01:10 PM »
Reply

Federer in 5
Roddick in 3
Haas in 5
Kohlschreiber in 4
Querrey in 5
IP Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Reply 
« previous next »