Home Login Register
MurraysWorld  >  Tennis Talk  >  BBC BLASTED BY ATP CHEIF
Pages: [1] 2 Reply

BBC BLASTED BY ATP CHEIF

Reply

I  am so glad that the BBC got snubbed as their up their own arses most of the time. The ATP chief couldn't uinderstand why the bbc didn't show the french open final  and decided to show a far less important event, he said lots of other intresting things. More coverage of tennis been shown bout bloody time
IP Logged
Reply

i watched this .... lets see if they are going to do something about it !! and there lack of tennis coverage , there excuse was o it costs to much .
Did you here it when he said that only 14% of the fans in France had herd of the masters cup !!!  jaw shocking

IP Logged
Reply

 shocking Really???  shocking


Okay - well i won't be suprised if that percentage is less in Britian. Rolling Eyes

BBC better do something about it!!!!! The BBCi coverage was not too bad for RG. Managed to get at least 2 friends to press that darn button.  :P
IP Logged
Reply

shocking Really???  shocking


Okay - well i won't be suprised if that percentage is less in Britian. Rolling Eyes

BBC better do something about it!!!!! The BBCi coverage was not too bad for RG. Managed to get at least 2 friends to press that darn button.  :P

well done julie .... did you convert them??.. im sure it is less in britain , but they were asking the people who attended RG , its shocking
IP Logged
Reply

Very Happy Well.. yes if you would like to call it that. The existence ( shocking ) of Murray, Nadal and Roddick is being spread at mighty speed!  :P
IP Logged
Reply

Very Happy Well.. yes if you would like to call it that. The existence ( shocking ) of Murray, Nadal and Roddick is being spread at mighty speed!  :P

well done  =D> =D>, i am doing the same job , i got a few of my friends to watch RG final , but that may have been because it was better than revising , but they still watched it
IP Logged
Reply

what bout what stich said  germany don't cover wimbeldon too expensive, whats all that about awful
IP Logged
Reply

what bout what stich said  germany don't cover wimbeldon too expensive, whats all that about awful

yeah i also herd that , he said that they dont even show a highlights show , i mean at least the BBC did a 1hr highlight show
IP Logged
Reply

I was more surprised when he said 2/3 of tennis fans in France and Germany hadn't heard of Nadal.
IP Logged
Reply

Only reason BBC's coverage of Wimbledon is second to none is cause it's free. As a result everyone knows everything about Wimbledon and nothing the rest of the year!
IP Logged
Reply

What do you mean by "it's free". If you mean free to watch then part of the debate is that they should give more prominence to other slams since they do have the rights to show them.
IP Logged
Reply

Did I not read somewhere that the BBC get the rights for Wimbledon free? If not it's dirt cheap! That's why they show so much cause it doesn't cost them as much as the other slams would.
IP Logged
Reply

Hmmm... Maybe we should we happy BBC covers it and not some poor channel no one ever gets. I have to watch it on the Holland channel, please, it's bad enough. I'll take BBC any day.
IP Logged
Reply

The BBC's coverage of wimbledon is second to none. won't criticise them on that. mind you, have to wait to see how they cope with both it and the World cup on at the same time. Last time the matches were finished by lunchtime, it being in Korea and all that.
IP Logged
arka
Reply

The BBC reporters know almost nothing of tennis.
They dont even know sites where they can check out entry lists and stuff.
IP Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Reply