March 2008, he hadn't lost his dominance.
Ok, I got the next two posts wrong, so what? I wasn't "utterlly owned" as you put it.
Ok wrong on nadal winning wimbledon, but that was how I felt, maybe owned on that.
And I still maintain Fed lost that match rather than Nadal winning it. Fed should have won.
Hardly "utterlly owned" to be honest. If i had said something like "Fed will win everything and be world number 1 forever!" then you could say I was owned.