Home Search Calendar Help Login Register
Did you miss your activation email?
MurraysWorld Discussions  >  General Community  >  Tennis Talk  >  Parmar won... 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Reply
Author

Parmar won...

 (Read 718 times)
fuzzyballs
Challenger Level
*
Posts: 1,021


Parmar won... « on: April 09, 2006, 04:49 PM »
Reply

comfortably against that kid from the doubles. If Bates had played Murray instead of Rusedski we may well have won. Bates now trying to make out that Murray could not play today

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/4893566.stm

This is nonsense as he was fine yesterday. He's just looking for excuses for his own poor tactical play in this tie.


IP Logged
Banannie
Veteran
******
Posts: 7,362

Gender: Female
Location: UK


Re: Parmar won... « Reply #1 on: April 09, 2006, 04:50 PM »
Reply

Hey fuzzy - where does it say that Parmar won?
IP Logged
Neil
John McEnroe
*********
Posts: 16,735

Gender: Male


Re: Parmar won... « Reply #2 on: April 09, 2006, 04:52 PM »
Reply

Doctors advice says otherwise. However, if andy wanted to play bates maybe should have given him a shot. BUT, you still can't hinge it all on Andy having played on the first day. If Andy had played today, Rusedski would still be playing the first game anyway, so it wouldn't make much of a difference.
IP Logged
Banannie
Veteran
******
Posts: 7,362

Gender: Female
Location: UK


Re: Parmar won... « Reply #3 on: April 09, 2006, 04:54 PM »
Reply

This is nonsense as he was fine yesterday. He's just looking for excuses for his own poor tactical play in this tie.




Bates was probably just following advice from doctors - he's a good guy generally, and he ws probably trying to help out Andy...
IP Logged
Spud
Futures Level
**
Posts: 568

Gender: Male
Location: Bristol


Copywight 1994 Elmer Fudd. All wights wesewved

Re: Parmar won... « Reply #4 on: April 09, 2006, 04:54 PM »
Reply

Parmar won 7-5, 6-4 http://www.daviscup.com/ties/tie.asp?tie=100007746
IP Logged
top_spin
Murraymaniac
**********
Posts: 22,270

Gender: Female
Location: UK


Re: Parmar won... « Reply #5 on: April 09, 2006, 04:57 PM »
Reply

 confused That was quick!
IP Logged
Quackers
Murraymaniac
**********
Posts: 22,035

Gender: Female


Re: Parmar won... « Reply #6 on: April 09, 2006, 04:58 PM »
Reply

Thats brilliant!  Now hes not a "lost every match played for Davis Cup" player anymore!
IP Logged
Neil
John McEnroe
*********
Posts: 16,735

Gender: Male


Re: Parmar won... « Reply #7 on: April 09, 2006, 05:00 PM »
Reply

Yeah but he's still crap in comparison to the rest
IP Logged
Tennis-Player
ATP Level
***
Posts: 1,776

Gender: Male
Location: Staffs/Shrops


Re: Parmar won... « Reply #8 on: April 09, 2006, 05:36 PM »
Reply

Well, well done Arvind, but it hardly matters now. If only Greg could have beaten Djokovic and Murray would have played the final rubber... he would have absolutely crushed Bozoljac!
IP Logged
rochelle
Top Seed
*****
Posts: 5,574

Gender: Female
Location: wrexham ( unfortunatly)


Andy and Jamie

Re: Parmar won... « Reply #9 on: April 09, 2006, 06:34 PM »
Reply

i new he was playin not Murray fuzzeyballs
IP Logged
ljsmall
Veteran
******
Posts: 9,721

Gender: Female
Location: Peterhead (near Aberdeen)


It's a Murray Duck!

Re: Parmar won... « Reply #10 on: April 10, 2006, 11:33 AM »
Reply

comfortably against that kid from the doubles. If Bates had played Murray instead of Rusedski we may well have won. Bates now trying to make out that Murray could not play today

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/tennis/4893566.stm

This is nonsense as he was fine yesterday. He's just looking for excuses for his own poor tactical play in this tie.




You're speaking nonsense! That article you posted there quite clearly states that Murray was set to play today against advice. And it's true! Andy was sitting ready to play if Greg had won. Greg had to play 1st for 2 reasons.

1. he had to play Djokovic cause he'd already played the other guy they had in for singles (that would have been playing against Murray had Greg won, they just rolled out that doubles dude cause it was a dead tie)

2. Andy was only going to play if he was needed in order to win the tie. What would be the point in him playing against medical advice, winning and then Greg losing anyway. They needed to know that it was essential for Andy to play before he possibly did himself a damage.

You know much as I like you sometimes Fuzzy you do say some of the stupidest things!!! Try reading your articles before you post them to back up a stupid claim.
IP Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Reply 
« previous next »