I'm starting to think all this nonsense being made up of Roger being nothing but an embarrasment, as well as deluded and foolish is because some people here can't take it that Roger will always be better than Andy.
I know you're baiting, so I'll just say this. Who is winning their head to head, Andy or Federer, or does that count for nothing in your little mind?
Granted, Federer has won more majors and it's unlikely that Andy will equal that (I wouldn't rule him out of surpassing Djokovic's total though) but when since has the number of majors a player has won been the sole measure of how good they are?
Federer won't 'always be better than Andy'. Between the two of them now, over the last 12 months or so, it's been patently obvious that Andy has become the better player.