He's a sore loser, luckily we don't have to put up with that side of him much, but this might change.

STICKS AND STONES MAY BREAK MURRAYS BONES, BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY HE BEAT HIM.

Actually this really annoys me...who watched the match here? Was it more Fed playing badly or did Andy actually play really well? Cause if he played well then Fed should definitely give him the credit he deserves rather than being just a bad loser..

Honestly, Andy played really well. I mean Federer definetly wasn't 100% but Andy deserves credit, without any exceptions.

I just want to paint a balanced picture for those who didnt see it...

Murray played pretty well, but to be honest Ive yet to see Murray play top class attacking tennis other than when Nadal brings it out of him.

Murray did indeed defend deep behind the baseline, but where Fed says he waited for mistakes i'd suggest he drew those mistakes out of Fed. Murray also came up with some top drawer winners at the right moments, and served amazingly well - especially on the key points. I felt that Federer did however come up with the more amazing shots on occasions.

It was an intelligent and lethal game of tennis from Murray's point of view, he did what he needed to pick off his opponent, remaining unbelievably calm when he went a set down. It was a high quality 1st round match, but it still only had the intensity of a 1st round match.

So Federer's comments arent completely untrue but he makes it sound like Murray was 'cheating' in some way, or got lucky, or that Fed gave it to him which is very petulant. Murray had a gameplan today, he made choices - not to come in and give Fed a target; to serve and play to federer's slightly inferior backhand; to defend deep when neccesary, etc. Federer is obviously frustrated that Murray the right tactics and temperament to get the better of him.

Murray was that good today. I think it's a bit unfair to say he sat back and waited for mistakes because in loads of the rally's the last 3 or four shots would all have been winners against anyone else.

Andy hit the ball so well and so cleverly he outfoxed Federer.

And maybe Fed's just a little frightened people will start to believe they can beat him. A little bit of Sports psychology in those quotations. Beaten by Djoko then beaten by Murray, he's gotta be scared. The Gasquet's and Tsonga's of this world'll be right at his heels.

 But thats his gameplan, he makes other people look bad and make mistakes.

...and NO dropshots!   Fed's a fud. Well done Muzz. No fistpumps at the end either...that must have hurt even more. Makes it look like a first set blip on the way to a routine first rd victory. No wonder Rog was a sore loser

It's pathetic.....they bite the bait every time.

Federer played an excellent first set but was still a bit lucky to win it. but as the match went on he made more mistakes especially in 3rd set.  So he would argue Andy did nothing to win and just waited for the mistakes.  However a lot of those mistakes where on the backhand from a Murray forehand. So though they may appear unforced errors as is Andys way he simply found where his opponent was not at his best on the day and punished him for it.