He'd need about 1250 points from mandatory tourneys. He could get thatby Wimbledon by reaching a quarter and a semi in the two slams, and 3 quarters and a semi in the 4 masters. If you think he should be top 4, then he should get that!

Except that recently, the world No 1 has been into the press room within 15 minutes, a touch flustered and not knowing what to expect as a question and what his answer might be. That was the case at the Pacific Life Open, after his 6-3, 6-2 defeat by Mardy Fish, the American, in the semi-finals, his worst day at the office in seven years in terms of fewest games won in a three-set match. Federer played jumpily with the microphone, much as he had done with his game on the court against Fish, a former top20 player who fell away to No 341 at the start of 2006 after a series of injuries, the worst of which, to his left wrist, required two operations the previous year. In this tournament, Fish had beaten Nikolay Davydenko, Lleyton Hewitt and, in the quarter-finals, David Nalbandian, but no one had anticipated what a destructive force he had become. He beat Federer in 63 minutes.

I can see Nadal taking the Wimbledon title and Nole taking the US Open title  

Djokovic maybe but Nadal no.

I'm English, but don't worry, I understood you, I was just wondering where you think he should be ranked at the moment? (that is, his current ATP ranking doesn't take in to account his long injury last year, so its a bit of a false ranking...)