Andy Murray Tennis Player Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register to participate in this Andy Murray message board.
Home Search Login Register
MurraysWorld Discussions  >  Murray Community  >  Andy Talk  >  If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Reply
Author Topic: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked  (Read 873 times)
fuzzyballs
Challenger Level
**
Posts: 808


If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « on: April 08, 2006, 12:12:01 AM »

He was clearly fine, and might have sealed the tie for us today. As things stand it's going to be tough, and I still get the feeling he won't play and it's more manipulation to keep the numbers up.
Logged
Mark
Murraymaniac
*
Posts: 29,287

Gender: Male
Location: London


Perfect.

Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #1 on: April 08, 2006, 12:19:00 AM »

You're a legend.
Logged
arka
Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #2 on: April 08, 2006, 02:03:41 AM »

He is not.
Logged
top_spin
John McEnroe
*
Posts: 16,286

Gender: Female
Location: London


Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #3 on: April 08, 2006, 02:20:15 AM »

 yes
Logged
arka
Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #4 on: April 08, 2006, 02:28:19 AM »

Yes for what? He being a legend or he not being one???
Logged
top_spin
John McEnroe
*
Posts: 16,286

Gender: Female
Location: London


Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #5 on: April 08, 2006, 02:30:11 AM »

not Wink
Logged
arka
Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #6 on: April 08, 2006, 02:34:37 AM »

Thanks then.
Logged
goslabs
Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #7 on: April 08, 2006, 11:49:56 AM »

You're a legend.

You're [fuzzyballs] a twat, is probably closer to the mark  Wink
Logged
top_spin
John McEnroe
*
Posts: 16,286

Gender: Female
Location: London


Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #8 on: April 08, 2006, 02:14:56 PM »

 confused HAH i didn't understand a word of that!

 hug hug
Logged
top_spin
John McEnroe
*
Posts: 16,286

Gender: Female
Location: London


Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #9 on: April 08, 2006, 02:15:56 PM »

P.S goslabs ..your PM is coming shortly.  hug i'm so sorry.  whack naughty girl.
Logged
rafa
Grand Slam Champion
*
Posts: 13,304

Gender: Female
Location: Londonshire innit!


I think he's getting better looking....

Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #10 on: April 08, 2006, 07:46:06 PM »

fuzzyballs is truly THE LEGEND!!   Wink
Logged
JohnW
Veteran
******
Posts: 8,865

Gender: Male
Location: Back...


Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #11 on: April 08, 2006, 07:47:48 PM »

Legend indeed!  =D>

Though I do wonder if he has a PhD in kicking your ass... he's probably not half the legend Dr Tran is! lol
Logged
goslabs
Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #12 on: April 08, 2006, 08:19:51 PM »

confused HAH i didn't understand a word of that!

 hug hug

After reading it through, neither did I !!!

Basically what I meant to convey is that fuzzyballs is a twat but then again, everyone already knows that !!!
Logged
Amy
Challenger Level
**
Posts: 1,326

Location: the land of far, far away...


Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #13 on: April 09, 2006, 06:05:03 PM »

Andy didnt play because he wasnt 100% and it was a sensible decision to sit the djokovic match out. Rather sacrifice 1 game than not be able to play the next 20 because he did too much too soon. It was a wise decision made by both Andy and Batesy together.
Logged
arka
Re: If Murray does not play Sat/Sun Bates should be sacked « Reply #14 on: April 09, 2006, 06:14:19 PM »

Thanks Amy. Great to see that you think in the same way as me hug
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Reply 
« previous next »