Andy Murray Tennis Player Forum
Home Search Calendar Help Login Register
MurraysWorld Discussions  >  Murray Community  >  Jamie Talk  >  Jamie/Liezel v Bob Bryan/Stosur 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Reply
Author Topic: Jamie/Liezel v Bob Bryan/Stosur  (Read 263 times)
Allan
Veteran
*
Posts: 8,519

Gender: Male
Location: Falkirk, Central Scotland


Jamie/Liezel v Bob Bryan/Stosur « on: July 04, 2008, 09:00:45 AM »

Mixed doubles semi-final.  yay cmon yeah


It'll be on Centre Court after the men's semi-finals. Smile


C'mon Jamie
Logged
Clydey
Top Seed
*
Posts: 5,264

Gender: Male
Location: Scotland


Blasphemy is a victimless crime.

Re: Jamie/Liezel v Bob Bryan/Stosur « Reply #1 on: July 04, 2008, 09:52:42 AM »


Mixed doubles semi-final.  yay cmon yeah


It'll be on Centre Court after the men's semi-finals. Smile


C'mon Jamie


Go on, Jamie son.
 yay

Logged
Annie Binannie
ATP Level
***
Posts: 2,782

Gender: Female
Location: Aberdeen


Wouldn't you just....

Re: Jamie/Liezel v Bob Bryan/Stosur « Reply #2 on: July 04, 2008, 10:42:55 AM »

C'mon Jamie


=D
Logged
Miss Lady Amy
Grand Slam Champion
********
Posts: 14,287

Gender: Female


I'll kiss it better for you!

Re: Jamie/Liezel v Bob Bryan/Stosur « Reply #3 on: July 04, 2008, 07:01:21 PM »

Jamie is out Frown
Logged
Allan
Veteran
*
Posts: 8,519

Gender: Male
Location: Falkirk, Central Scotland


Re: Jamie/Liezel v Bob Bryan/Stosur « Reply #4 on: July 04, 2008, 07:23:29 PM »

Stosur played great towards the end of that match but Jamie was too eager to get his racket on the ball at times.  doh
Logged
Clydey
Top Seed
*
Posts: 5,264

Gender: Male
Location: Scotland


Blasphemy is a victimless crime.

Re: Jamie/Liezel v Bob Bryan/Stosur « Reply #5 on: July 04, 2008, 07:35:28 PM »

They had that in the bag.  Lots of break chances in the second set and most of them were there for the taking.  Stosur really kept the other pairing in it.  Bob Bryan was just a big serve for most of the match.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Reply 
« previous next »