Rule Changes - 02/04/08 - Andy Murray Forum

dentie

John McEnroe

Posts: 17,674

Gender: Female

Location: Belgium

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #20 on: April 03, 2008, 09:50:22 AM »

Invisibleman... by day a goalie, by night RTR-manager. secret service agent

Or is that the other way around? Think


	Logged

invisibleman18

Veteran

Posts: 7,260

Gender: Male

Location: New Zealand

MW 2006 Fantasy WC and Prediction League Champion

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #21 on: April 03, 2008, 10:00:19 AM »

Well I had training this evening so I guess tonight it's both! lol


	Logged

ljsmall

Veteran

Posts: 7,870

Gender: Female

Location: Peterhead (near Aberdeen)

It's a Murray Duck!

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #22 on: April 03, 2008, 12:04:42 PM »

Having guys in different timezones will be very useful!


	Logged

nkp2

World No 1

Posts: 12,024

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #23 on: April 05, 2008, 04:54:17 AM »

is all that needs to be said.

Also I love the Shanghai addition! Only thing is though.... does that mean the Shanghai winner is the champ or is it the world number 1 who wins? lol


	Logged

Mark

Murraymaniac

Posts: 23,498

Gender: Male

Location: London

Murray, please get rid of the yes-men.

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #24 on: April 05, 2008, 01:11:38 PM »

As with the ATP, world no-1 at the end of the season wins. Smile


	Logged

nkp2

World No 1

Posts: 12,024

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #25 on: April 05, 2008, 10:57:33 PM »

What are we doing for ties. No one has yet come back to give their opinions on the whole tie matter....


	Logged

Mark

Murraymaniac

Posts: 23,498

Gender: Male

Location: London

Murray, please get rid of the yes-men.

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #26 on: April 05, 2008, 11:12:54 PM »

Sorry, I don't keep track of this board enough. Please explain to me the problem in this thread and preferably give me your suggestions to resolve the issue and I'll make sure it gets sorted soon.


	Logged

nkp2

World No 1

Posts: 12,024

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #27 on: April 05, 2008, 11:19:10 PM »

Quote from: nkp2 on March 25, 2008, 11:37:39 PM

Alex, you are starting off with greast posts then totally going in the other direction! lmao

Right, here's my FULL PROPOSAL.

If after all matches are complete, two or more players are tied, the following shall occur.

- At the start of the week, post a finals prediction, with the player expected to win and in how many sets.
- The winner of the tie, will be the one who either gets the correct final prediction or comes closest to this.
- In the event that none of the tied players achieves a correct final prediction whoever got closer will get the higher points.
- Closer is defined as whoever had one player get further in the tournament.
- If this is tied, then whoever got their second player further in the tournament
- If this is still tied, straws shall be drawn for who gets the higher points. ( to make it a closer competition you COULD change this to whoever is behind in the overall leaderboard gets the points.... but this situation I believe is unlikely)

This was based on the fact that we felt it unfair to allow previous weeks to count for this week's performance. So do away with bonus point for finals, and do the above. Was the suggestion.

Julia's idea initially btw, I just detailed it.


	Logged

Mark

Murraymaniac

Posts: 23,498

Gender: Male

Location: London

Murray, please get rid of the yes-men.

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #28 on: April 06, 2008, 12:00:33 AM »

Can you explain to me why you want to get rid of bonus points for finals?


	Logged

nkp2

World No 1

Posts: 12,024

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #29 on: April 06, 2008, 01:18:56 AM »

Because, we want to introduce a new tie system. Or at least that was the discussion. And a few of us said that the finals prediction was the best way to do this. So keeping the bonus points is pointless under such a system.

I.e. Say i get a 100% accurate finals prediction and I catch up with another player tying on points. I would then, under this new system, beat them due to a more accurate finals prediction, despite my predictions over the week being 5 points worse off. Seems a tab unfair for such a consistent performer (or indeed the consistent performers who finished between 1-4 points ahead) to lose out to someone who frankly "fluked" a finals prediction.

Follow?


	Logged

nkp2

World No 1

Posts: 12,024

Re: Rule Changes - 02/04/08 « Reply #30 on: April 06, 2008, 01:20:00 AM »

I can give a mathematical example should it be required.


	Logged

Pages: 1 [2]

MurraysWorld Discussions > General Community > Read-the-Round > Rule Changes - 02/04/08

« previous next »