Well he's hardly the greatest player of all time when he's been so clearly dominated By Nadal for the last 5 years (& on all surfaces bar a subset of one) now is he AK400?
I have real difficulties with such a leap of faith personally, but then I'm not a Fed fan, I prefer facts.
No, Roger was just a bit older than the other 3, that is all.
As for Murray, 2 slam wins against an immature Murray doth not a dominance maketh, we'll have to give this puppy a few more goes before judgement can reasonably be made on that.
Let's say... best of 7 shall we?
Rogers got the head start too, he'll just need 2 more.
Hell need to claim them from the start also as I doubt Roger shall be around for a full 'best of 7 actually.
Oh and last year in London for the record, Murray was nervous (Roger himself was 'shocked' by his performance) just as he was in the Oz Open final.
Guess what AK400, he's not always going to be nervous from now on.
And when he isnt, I suspect beatings like Roger received in Shanghai last year shall be what you and the 'maestro' shall have to get used to, until he finally retires that is.
He has won 16 majors more than anyone in the history of the game, has won 3 Grand Slams in a year 3 times, made the most semis in the world, most great players past and present all have said he is the greatest ever. The only person who could possible put in a claim to say otherwise is Laver, but the competetion wasnt the same back then and they did not play on so many different surfaces.
2008 Murray was young, but that isnt an excuse to lose a major final not when he had just beaten the world number 1 in the semi final in fine fashion.
In 2010 Murray got hammered again by Roger and Murray who the world number 4, so him being young and not ready isnt really much of an excuse when he was some brave pundits pick to win it all that year.
Del Potro younger than Murray, came out and took out Rafa and Roger back to back in the Open 2009, I did not see his supporters making the excuse of him being too young or anything when he had to play Roger in the final, you are good enough to make a final then you aer mature enough to win it, if you are good enough is another issue.
I am quite happy for Murray to face Roger in all of Roger's remaining Major finals, it is a great draw for Roger the match is on his racket, escpailly if Murray's 1st serve is down, Roger can pretty much break him at will or break back whenever needed, see AO 2010 3rd set or US 2008 2nd set.
Djokovic is the slight favourite to win in Australia this year, and rightly so he is playing amazing tennis right now, but as I have said before against anyone else in the draw, the match is on Roger's racket that includes Nadal.