MurraysWorld  >  Chit Chat  >  Scottish politics
Poll
 If the referendum were held now, how would you vote?
YES to independence
NO to independence
Don't know

Pages: 1 ... 491 492 493 [494] 495 496 497 ... 527 Reply

Scottish politics

Quote

^ If I remember correctly Blair promised Constitution reform and devolution to secure his majority in Parliament and what was put in place after was thought then and is now proven to be a poor solution for the Scottish to have more say in governance.
However i was always cynical of the transparent manipulation of the electorate by Blair so you all may have another view. I suppose he did do what the Tories always resisted and recognised that devolution which was recommended by many reports over thirty years did happen albeit done badly.
IP Logged
Quote

^ If I remember correctly Blair promised Constitution reform and devolution to secure his majority in Parliament and what was put in place after was thought then and is now proven to be a poor solution for the Scottish to have more say in governance.

Nope. The Scottish government has more powers than practically any other devolved administration in the world.

They obviously don't actually exercise most of those powers because a) the Scots are actually just like the English, and tend towards small-c conservatism and b) actually exercising those powers would demonstrate the lie and the heart of their separatist arguments.
IP Logged
Quote

^ If I remember correctly Blair promised Constitution reform and devolution to secure his majority in Parliament and what was put in place after was thought then and is now proven to be a poor solution for the Scottish to have more say in governance.
Whatever Blair's motive was I always understood that he came to regret the decision to grant devolution to Scotland and Wales at that particular time.  In a report in The Telegraph in 2015 he said -

“We should have understood that, when you change the system of government so that more power is devolved, you need to have ways of culturally keeping England, Scotland and Wales very much in sync with each other.

“We needed to work even stronger for a sense of UK national identity.


Adding -

“But I don’t accept the idea that we should never have done devolution.

“If we had not devolved power, then there would have been a massive demand for separation – as there was back in the 60s and 70s.”
IP Logged
Quote

Boogers,  I understand what you say but I am not certain how the strength of the assessed powers has anything to do with effectiveness which does end up with a desire to go independent. More is sometimes not better if the procedures frustrate what the population want.

I will not argue the point. It is good to see different interpretations to understand Scotland.
IP Logged
Quote

Aileen,

I agree with a lot of what you say. Devolution as implemented was a total disaster to my mind.  It should have been done better!
IP Logged
Quote

@MA

It wasn't me who said it, but Tony Blair - although how it could have been done better I wouldn't know.

He's also been quoted as saying that "Devolution is a dangerous game to play because you can never be sure where nationalist sentiment ends and separatist sentiment begins."  Yet despite that he agreed to it probably because, as we know, he dislikes the concept of nationalism and has always been against the idea of independence, so saw devolution as a good compromise at the time.
IP Logged
Quote

Firstly, I'd rather hope that Sarwar isn't a socialist, because socialists are monsters just like fascists. He's probably more accurately described as a social democrat.

Secondly, Sarwar isn't a director of USW, and as such has absolutely no control over how the company is run.

Thirdly, the lack of union representation at USW has nothing to do with the company.


Sarwar owns 43% shares in the company worth an estimated 4.8 million his wife is also a shareholder.   Not quite in line with “for the many not the few”.
IP Logged
Quote

What's wrong with owning shares?

It's a shame you ignored the rest of the post.
IP Logged
Quote

What's wrong with owning shares?


Yes, If owning shares is so bad, then the majority of MPs and SMP’s would have to resign.  There are very few politicians (in any party)  living on the breadline, even if they do claim to have a “for the many not the few” as their goal in society.
IP Logged
Quote

@MA

He's also been quoted as saying that "Devolution is a dangerous game to play because you can never be sure where nationalist sentiment ends and separatist sentiment begins."  Yet despite that he agreed to it probably because, as we know, he dislikes the concept of nationalism and has always been against the idea of independence, so saw devolution as a good compromise at the time.

In any case its probably important not to overstate Blair's role in the whole thing. He deserves credit for it, but he inherited a widespread policy consensus around going for devolution which his predecessor described as 'the settled will' of Scotland.
IP Logged
Quote

In any case its probably important not to overstate Blair's role in the whole thing. He deserves credit for it, but he inherited a widespread policy consensus around going for devolution which his predecessor described as 'the settled will' of Scotland.
Yes you're right about that.  I'd forgotten about John Smith's part in all this.
IP Logged
Quote

It is very obvious that any argument Scots put forward for independence will be rebuffed by boogers who seems to forget that we still live in a democracy. That however may not last for much longer as BJ is intent on revoking powers that the Scottish Government currently have.

However, his plans may be scuppered as the outlook for the Tories does not look very good at the present as the leader of the Tory party in Scotland is totally incompetent and wee Ruthie has come back to try and improve their ratings. 

I hope Mr Ross is a better football referee than he was as leader of the Scottish Tory Party it looks like he has already been given the push. 

By the way Boogers it will be the Scottish People who will decide who will govern Scotland. It will be "the settled
will" of Scotland and her people.
IP Logged
Quote

The ethno-nationalist speaks!

It is very obvious that any argument Scots put forward for independence will be rebuffed by boogers who seems to forget that we still live in a democracy.

I'll certainly rebuff stupid arguments - like your claims about resources.

Quote
That however may not last for much longer as BJ is intent on revoking powers that the Scottish Government currently have.

We've already established that is, in practical terms, is nonsense. Why keep repeating it?
IP Logged
Quote

In any case its probably important not to overstate Blair's role in the whole thing. He deserves credit for it, but he inherited a widespread policy consensus around going for devolution which his predecessor described as 'the settled will' of Scotland.

IMO the biggest mistake the New Labour government made with devolution is the failure to tackle the problem of English devolution.

I suppose this is understandable - there isn't obvious way of breaking England down into regions of approximately the same size as Scotland, Wales or NI in a way that'd put the "but England is bigger than all of us so will always out vote us" complaints to rest.
IP Logged
Quote

IMO the biggest mistake the New Labour government made with devolution is the failure to tackle the problem of English devolution.

I suppose this is understandable - there isn't obvious way of breaking England down into regions of approximately the same size as Scotland, Wales or NI in a way that'd put the "but England is bigger than all of us so will always out vote us" complaints to rest.

There is also the issue of demand - proposing powerful assemblies across England in 1999 would likely have been attacked by some as more politicians, more waste, who really wants this etc. That said, we do see more calls now in some regions for devo to parallel Scotland/Wales so things may slowly move more that way...
IP Logged
Pages: 1 ... 491 492 493 [494] 495 496 497 ... 527 Reply