Actually, it might have been 109. That's 38 more than Roger!
Also, Connors won 128 singles and doubles titles, and John McEnroe won 152.
128 singles and doubles titles! Imagine that. How many doubles titles does Roger the Dodger have?
So now not only cannot you not write a balanced argument which you yourself accept, you are not capable of having a decent debate without moving the goal posts!
Roger being proud of winning so many titles is nothing do to with Jimbo or Mac, to say otherwise shows either trolling or sheer idiocy on your part.
If Andy Murray said he is proud of reaching 3 Grand Slam finals and some wannabe journo said, oh but Sampras actually reached 18 Grand Slam finals and won 14 of them, 18 is a lot more than 3, they would rightly be told they are a troll because Murray would be talking about himself not Sampras!
Likewise by you bringing Connors and McEnroe into the argument, you show that all you are here to do is to try and denigrate the most prolific Grand Slam winner of all time.