I dont have any sympathy for him and no I dont care about him in a personal way at all. I've never met him I dont know him so I why would I say I cared. I dont. I'm sure he's not offended!
I'm afraid the only thing I appreciate about Murray is the way he plays (played) tennis.
somethings gone west since team murray assembled/ Brad Gilbert departed. what is it I wonder? thats the key to it all and what interests me not how happy or sad he is, whether he's had a row with his girl or mum who cares? lets bypass all the guff and try to find out whats wrong because he doesn't know thats for sure.He says he hasn't a clue whats wrong doesnt even know if he's tired.
what on earth is the point of saying how sorry we are for him or how "we care"
I want him back playing the tennis he was just before and after he split with Gilbert,
I agree with you about Andy’s tennis ability, Rob, but, speaking as a qualified psychologist, I see your remarks about his psychological problems as being a bit pessimistic.
He has psychological problems as do all players in the course of matches, once they start making errors, and become frustrated, despondent and diffident, but I don’t see him as being psychotic and needing psychiatric treatment, but I may be wrong. What are your credentials for thinking he does?
Now that's baiting if ever I've seen it.
George, how old are yourself and Daisy? Pretty childlike behaviour from the pair of you. The thing is, it's so transparent.
Sorry to see you thought I was a liar when I said no baiting was intended Joe. I thought my remarks were rather restrained and mildly amusing, and thought Hazel would see the joke, but apologies to her if she didn’t.
Not sure what age has to do with it. As for Daisy, she tells me she thinks we Christians should practice what we preach, when we post and be completely honest, truthful, kind and caring, as Christ teaches us to be. Guess I have to agree with her on that. I’m sorry you find my humour offensive.
I said I was making a joke about Nadal not autism.
Also Joe, George isn't just baiting he's lying because I said 'might have' and NOT 'did have' where as he reports it being the other way around.
I’m sorry you think I lied, baited you and misquoted you Hazel, but where did you say “might have”
I thought you said in your quotation below: “more likely to “have” autistic tendencies”
without any “might”, but I can understand it if you thought
you said “might” but left it out by accident.
If you want pick a tennis player more likely to have autistic tendencies
then look towards Rafa not Murray