Although i subscribe to the view that Milner is very much cack out there, isn't Walcott better suited to the role of an impact sub, coming on to scare the crap out of tiring defences?
No, for me that's Chamberlain. Given there is no creativity at all in the midfield, Walcott is the guy who causes danger from the start. Perhaps if your leading with 20 minutes to go and holding onto a lead you don't need that impact sub to try and desparately produce things in a hurry. For me that's the time you bring on Milner.
We'd also be top if Gerrard had left that volley for Chamberlain as it was falling straight onto his right foot for a tap in.