[Masaka]

Andy is defeated by Roger and is crying twice.

Where is the photograph?

The player we support on here Andy Murray, cried after his defeats because he felt he had let his country down. Fed the Pillock cries because he is like a small child who has had his toy taken away from him. A spoilt, selfish child who thinks all of the toys are his by rights.

The player we support on here Andy Murray is a quiet, unassuming young man, who never gives up, and who has overcome some major life traumas, to get where he is today.

The player you support, Fed the Pillock the purported GOAT (Gloating, Odious, Arrogant Tosser), is an arrogant, jumped up, slimey, nasty bit of work, who is disloyal to his friends (I refer you to his charming comment about Stan Warwrinka), who has only won most of what he did win because he had such crap opposition for the majority of his career). A person who is so unpleasant,  that some unknown person got so fed up with his false, pseudo humble persona that they invented Pseudo Fed.

Just go away, you come over as a bigger, deluded fool than your false hero.

Which bit of This is a forum for Andy Murray supporters, not Fed the Pillock worshipers do you not understand?

[scotnadian]

[Masaka]

What kind of meaning is it? The meaning which I am writing
Andy is crying, only when defeated by Roger. Even when it is straight and loses. (Wimbledon is four sets.)

However, it is although the following year and Andy were straight also to Djokovic and were defeated. He is not crying. It is contradictory although I like Andy.

Roger lost and it cried in the ceremony only at that time. It was a time of there being a meaning of many records.

Except this forum, it is not valid.  Andy  fan criticizes Roger?
?

I agree with Gnome dense is an understatement.

 You carry on pondering the great mysteries of the world. There seems to be plenty of space in the great chasm where normal people's brains reside.

So on an Andy Murray forum it is perfectly valid for a Roger Federer fan to criticise Andy Murray, but you are then surprised when an Andy Murray fan criticises Fed the Pillock. You sir, are as false as your hero.

Didn't it strike you for a nano second that coming on here posting a string of pictures of Fed the Pillock wining, might just be offensive. We all know Fed the Pillock has won a lot -  he never tires of telling people.

[Masaka]

Off to bed, Masaka. But before I go...

:-)

[tennislover]

go to Roger's forum. To one player, they are attached and always write neither prejudice nor an anti opinion. Though it is a dislike player. never.


Masaka.[So on an Andy Murray forum it is perfectly valid for a Roger Federer fan to criticise Andy Murray, but you are then surprised when an Andy Murray fan criticises Fed]

[Masaka]

I am starting to suspect a wind up here. Our "friend 'Tennislover'  writes such diabolically poor English , yet has complete understanding of the comments written in response. I am smelling a large rat. Is this someone's idea of light entertainment to while away the time until Mr M started his campaign?

[michelle]

Definitely someone with a sad life, and I for one will now just scroll past their posts as I don't want to feed this Federer Troll.

[Masaka]

Nah  I don't know, but I doubt it Masaka! It would have to be someone with a very sad life! 

Definitely someone with a sad life, and I for one will now just scroll past their posts as I don't want to feed this Federer Troll.

Completely agree with you both. Mind you anyone who is stupid enough not to see beyond the cringeworthy,  false humility of Fed the Pillock, and so support him,  has to be fairly sad by definition.  I think the word for Fed the Pillock  is Ersatz.